Cases 71 - 80 of 575
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BARBOUR v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv01844
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BARBOUR
Defendant:
DAMIEN WILLIAMS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BINION WILLIAMS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2022cv01791
Plaintiff:
FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHAW v. NEGASI et al
as 1:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TERRELL SHAW
Defendant:
SEMIRA NEGASI, JOHN S. PEKALA, III, RAHELL NEGASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
