Cases 81 - 90 of 617
Scott v. Sisolak et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Scott
Defendant:
Steve F. Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske, Aaron D. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tutankhaman v. United States District Court
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv01503
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
United States District Court
Tutankhaman v. NASA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv01582
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant:
NASA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. Biden
as 2:2022cv01499
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden
Naessens v. Breslin et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
Michael Gerard Naessens
Defendant:
Frank Breslin, Andrew J. Barron, Lawrence H. Richardson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. United States Marshall
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv01526
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
United States Marshall
Tutankhaman v. United States Veteran Institute
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv01495
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
United States Veteran Institute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.