Cases 81 - 90 of 506
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Variscite NY One, Inc. v. State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
Variscite NY One, Inc.
Defendant:
State of New York, New York State Office of Cannabis Management and Christopher Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pagan v. East Greenbush Police Department
as 1:2022cv00969
Plaintiff:
Alexander Pagan
Defendant:
East Greenbush Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rushing v. George Washington University Hospital
as 1:2022cv07707
Plaintiff:
Shaun Akindo Alexande Rushing
Defendant:
George Washington University Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rushing et al v. U.S. Bank
as 1:2022cv07440
Plaintiff:
Shaun Akindo Alexande Rushing, 2300 Intelligence Agency LLC and 2300 Corporation Company
Defendant:
U.S. Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Albritton v. Fredella et al
as 1:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Jemal Albritton
Defendant:
Lawrence Fredella, Tina M. Stanford, Tyece Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rushing v. Municipal Credit Union
as 1:2022cv07413
Plaintiff:
Shaun Akindo Alexande Rushing
Defendant:
Municipal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rushing v. City MD
as 1:2022cv07339
Plaintiff:
Shaun Akindo Alexande Rushing
Defendant:
City MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
