Cases 81 - 90 of 98
Eggleston v. Williams et al
as 6:2009cv06285
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Eggleston
Defendant:
Max Williams, Fanger, Guillemin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Lewis v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2009cv06210
Plaintiff:
Elaine M. Lewis
Defendant:
City of Eugene, City of Eugene, Eric Klinko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parmenter v. City of Lowell, Oregon et al
as 6:2009cv06038
Plaintiff:
Barbara K. Parmenter
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Oregon, Timothy Yager, Estate of Richard Goldsberry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boggs v. Hoover et al
as 3:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
Robert Boggs
Defendant:
John K. Hoover, John C. Bradley, Charles R. French and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
King v. Capps et al
as 6:2008cv06195
Plaintiff:
Robert Haden King, Jr
Defendant:
Joe E. Capps, Ron Myers, Wade Scrogham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner et al v. DHS et al
as 6:2008cv06145
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Skinner, Susan Coffey Skinner, Laura Skinner and others
Defendant:
DHS, Lincoln County, Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
