Cases 81 - 90 of 593
Owens v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Superior Court of Bartow County and Samir J. Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. Fulton County et al
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Fulton County, State of Georgia, City of Sandy Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Williams-Mcdaniel v. State of Georgia
as 1:2022cv04434
Plaintiff:
Tara Williams-Mcdaniel
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 7:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
BROWN BROWN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wheeler et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv04176
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lavon Wheeler, Shakeyla Wheeler Greenidge and Archie Walker, III
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Chris Carr State Attorney General State of Georgia and Wade Damron Risk Management (DDAS) State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARNES v. MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
WILLILAM A BARNES
Defendant:
MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF, WILLIAM LESLIE, TENESIA LESLIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
