Cases 81 - 90 of 98
TORRES v. GLEN EAGLE SHOPPING CENTER LLC et al
as 2:2009cv04642
Plaintiff:
DIANA TORRES
Defendant:
GLEN EAGLE SHOPPING CENTER LLC and KEITH GURLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARTER v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2009cv02387
Plaintiff:
TIA CARTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MANUEL AVILA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MARQUEZ et al v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2009cv00909
Plaintiff:
CESAR MARQUEZ, III, BRANDON MAXWELL, ASHTON THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID GUZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MARQUEZ et al v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
CESAR MARQUEZ, III, BRANDON MAXWELL, ASHTON THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID GUZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GOOW v. TORRES et al
as 2:2008cv06285
Plaintiff:
ASLON GOOW, SR.
Defendant:
JOSE TORRES, JAMES T. WITTIG, TROY OSWALD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TORRES v. TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN et al
as 2:2008cv05890
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS TORRES
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERG POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS FARLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PURVIS v. TORRES, ET AL
as 2:2008cv03651
Defendant:
JON S. CORIZINE, NICHOLAS FIORE, DONNELL BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. PURVIS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
