Cases 81 - 90 of 141
ORTIZ-LOPEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv03607
Plaintiff:
LUIS N. ORTIZ-LOPEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LORETTA E. LYNCH, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2016cv01731
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU et al v. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B.
as 2:2015cv07056
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shammah v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 3:2015cv06727
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Shammah
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Dan Kobil, Ronan Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv04420
Plaintiff:
DONALD JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR CARTER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv02822
Plaintiff:
AUDREY TAYLOR CARTER
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv01846
Plaintiff:
ERIC J RHETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIPIETRO v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv01441
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE, GLENN GRANT, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01378
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES PATENT COMMISSION and U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00621
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
