Cases 81 - 90 of 1,487
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Dowling v. Legacy at Cypress Apartments, Tri Arc
as 1:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Angela D Dowling and Angela D Perez Dowling
Defendant:
Legacy at Cypress Apartments, Tri Arc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowling v. Google et al
as 1:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
Angela D Dowling and Angela D Perez Dowling
Defendant:
Google and Apple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez Dowling v. Geico.com et al
as 1:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Angela D Perez Dowling and Angela D Dowling
Defendant:
Geico.com, Amici.com, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowling v. Legacy at Cypress Apartments, Tri Arc
as 1:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Angela D Dowling and Angela D Perez Dowling
Defendant:
Legacy at Cypress Apartments, Tri Arc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowling v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 1:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Angela D Dowling and Angela D. Perez Dowling
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
