Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Williams Jr. et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Andy Williams Jr. and Tyrone Muhammad
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Brandon F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams Jr et al v. Heartland Realty Investors, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05730
Plaintiff:
Andy Hope Williams Jr and Vonita Cruz
Defendant:
Heartland Realty Investors, Inc. and Heartland Willowbrokok LLC doing business as Willowbrook Apartment Homes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams Jr v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv03543
Defendant:
State of Oregon, State of Missouri, State of South Carolina and others
Petitioner:
Andy Hope Williams Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Williams Jr v. The City of Aurora et al
as 1:2021cv03489
Defendant:
The City of Aurora, Kirsten Ziman and Jeff Tate
Plaintiff:
Andy Hope Williams Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Jr v. The City of Aurora et al
as 1:2020cv02549
Defendant:
Officer, Aurora Police Department, The City of Aurora and others
Plaintiff:
Andy Hope Williams Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Williams, Jr. v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv02495
Plaintiff:
Andy Hope Williams, Jr., Prophet, Hood Candidate and others
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzker and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
