Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BROWN v. CHOI et al
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BROWN
Defendant:
LUKE CHOI and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv02265
Defendant:
ALI ALEXANDER, DONALD J. TRUMP, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CONRAD SMITH, DANNY MCELROY, BYRON EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01321
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE et al v. PENCE et al
as 1:2020cv03791
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SAVAGE, RICHARD W KUCKSDORF, DEBI HAAS and others
Defendant:
BUTCH MILLER, U.S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, LEE CHATFIELD and others
Respondent:
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A. and Erick G. Kaardal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
O'CONNOR v. S.O.M.E. et al
as 1:2020cv02298
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, CHARLES ALLEN, VINCENT C. GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS v. SUBSEQUENT LIVING GIRLS AND FAMILIES
as 1:2020cv01818
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS
Defendant:
SUBSEQUENT LIVING GIRLS AND FAMILIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv01780
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MICHAEL JACOBS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
