Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanford v. Sargent et al
as 9:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Green Deborah, Shelley Mack, Keith Haverfield and others
Plaintiff:
David Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
LaForge v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2019cv00104
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Barbra Jefferson, Clifford Serawop and others
Plaintiff:
Michael F. LaForge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiFrancesco v. Bullock et al
as 2:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael DiFrancesco
Defendant:
Steve Bullock, Tim Fox, Sarah Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anato et al v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 4:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sodjine Paul Anato and Sarah Anato
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daforno v. Opper et al
as 4:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Nicole Daforno
Defendant:
Richard Opper, Martin Vining and Sarah Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 4:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Nikita Woods
Defendant:
Department of Child and Family Services, Terrence Lynch, Sarah Grotbo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Departmen of Child and Family Services et al
as 4:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nikita Woods
Defendant:
Departmen of Child and Family Services, Ike Jessee, Sarah Grotbo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anato et al v. Barney et al
as 4:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sodjine Paul Anato and Sarah Anato
Defendant:
Lad Barney and USDA Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Anato et al v. Barney et al
as 9:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Sodjine Paul Anato and Sarah Anato
Defendant:
Lad Barney and USDA Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
