Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Keller et al v. Beaverton Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv00788
Plaintiff:
B.R.K. and Robert Bernard Keller
Defendant:
Beaverton Police Department and Beaverton School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keller v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2014cv00292
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Terence C. Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Husmann v. Keller Lumber Company et al
as 6:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Rickey Husmann
Defendant:
Keller Lumber Company, Leia Leia and Jesse Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Warner et al v. Crook County, Oregon et al
as 6:2008cv06327
Defendant:
Crook County, Oregon, Crook County, Oregon, Penny Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Warner and Eagle Peak, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Stolk v. Giusto et al
as 3:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Stolk
Defendant:
Bernie Giusto, Sheriff's Deputy Does 1-10, Multnomah County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bartlett et al v. Crook County, Oregon et al
as 2:2007cv00716
Plaintiff:
Bradley Bartlett and Bartlett Excavation LLC
Defendant:
Crook County, Oregon, Crook County, Oregon, Penny Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
