Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Beard v. Mason et al
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Jada C. Beard
Defendant:
Tracey Mason, WNY Children's Psychiatric Center, Ann Marie Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
M. v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03001
Plaintiff:
R. M. and Rachel Meyers
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jess Dannhauser, Administration for Children's Services (ACS) of the City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Ward v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv08792
Plaintiff:
Kareem Ward
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Grand Lodge of Free Accepted Mason and Williams J. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
