Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PRATTS v. HAMMONTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv06470
Defendant:
RESPONDING OFFICERS, HAMMONTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and DETECTIVE RUSSELL
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PRATTS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. PRATT et al
as 1:2019cv00273
Plaintiff:
DANIEL D. FISHER, SR
Defendant:
STEVEN PRATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
FISHER v. PRATT
as 1:2017cv13248
Plaintiff:
DANIEL D. FISHER, SR
Defendant:
STEVEN PRATT, NEW JERSEY STATE FIRE MARSHAL OFFICE and SOUTHAMPTON TWP. FIRE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS et al v. RARITAN VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY et al
as 3:2016cv01938
Plaintiff:
LAURA RAMOS and CYNTHIA BAKER
Defendant:
RARITAN VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, JIM RICHART, JOYCE JONAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PRATT v. ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER et al
as 3:2015cv05779
Plaintiff:
LINDA PRATT
Defendant:
ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER and DR. ROBERT ROTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PRATT v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2013cv06830
Plaintiff:
ESTELLA PRATT
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN S. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATT v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ et al
as 2:2011cv04880
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PRATT
Defendant:
THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ, THE PORT AUTHORITY POLICE DEPT., ABC CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EWING v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 1:2009cv05432
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAN EWING
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DALE SCIORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
