Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Smith v. Bullit Co CHFS et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Antonio Allen Smith
Defendant:
Bullit Co CHFS and Commonwealth Cabinet for Health and Family Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Wallace v. Christian County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Toni L. Wallace
Defendant:
Christian County, Kentucky, Adam Smith, Joseph M. Brannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Melinda-Sue Smith
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice, Warren County Regional Jail, Stephen Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Doe v. Gorman et al
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Doug Gorman, Stephen Harmon, Brook Lindsey Harp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 6:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivers v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
Larry Parker, Daniel Kanyam, Joy Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
