Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ruse v. Jackson County et al
as 3:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Ezell, Officer Fnu Weeks, Officer Cendall Huynh and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Big Time Vapes, Inc. et al v. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2019cv00531
Defendant:
Norman E. Sharpless, Ned, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Plaintiff:
Big Time Vapes, Inc. and United States Vaping Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander v. River Place One Condominium Association, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00313
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Alexander
Defendant:
Marie Gaddis, River Place One Condominium Association, Inc., Christy Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roberts v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00322
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Correctional Medical Associates, Inc., John and Jane Does 1-24 and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cantor v. Sienna on the Coast Condominium Owners Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Todd Cantor
Defendant:
Sienna on the Coast Condominium Owners Association, Inc., Frank Gordon, Beth Mouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
