Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Molden et al v. American Arbitration Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01833
Plaintiff:
Regina S. Molden and Dianne Madray
Defendant:
American Arbitration Association, Inc. (New York) doing business as American Arbitration Association or AAA, Crow Vote LLC doing business as Fab Over 40 and Darrin Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
I. v. Barrow County Board of Education et al
as 2:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Tonya R. Crowe, Barrow County Board of Education, Keith B. Crowe and others
Plaintiff:
J. I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. City of Rome, Georgia et al
as 4:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
Albert Howard
Defendant:
City of Rome, Georgia, City of Rome Fire Captain Grant Collier, City of Rome Fire Marshall Billy Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odum v. Russell et al
as 4:2014cv00238
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Odum
Defendant:
Robert L. Russell, Rebecca Crowe, Larry Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
