Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fuller v Kirk et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Fuller
Defendant:
Judge Philip Kirk, Judge Raymond S Huber, Mary Calder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lush, Stephen v. O'Leary, David
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
David O'Leary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Siegmann v. Frohling et al
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leonard Siegmann
Defendant:
David W Frohling and Danielle J Van Egtern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahajni v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Marwan Mahajni
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Deputy Vo Do, Deputy Scott Woida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weston et al v. Amundsun et al
as 2:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
David Weston, TW and MB
Defendant:
Emilie Amundsun, John Jansen, Ron Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Von Germeten v. Racine County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Dean Von Germeten and Dean Richard Von Germeten
Defendant:
Racine County Circuit Court, Office of Corporation Counsel Windsor Court LLC, Michael J Piontek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juarez v. Noonan
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Patric J Noonan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juarez v. Racine City Clerk Odd Number Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Racine City Clerk Odd Number Doe, Michael J Piontek and David C Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
