Cases 1 - 10 of 132
KENNEDY et al v. GIRALO et al
as 1:2024cv09270
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY KENNEDY, HILDA T. KENNEDY and JOHN KENNEDY
Defendant:
AUDREY MILES, MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PINCKNEY v. SOMERSET PROBATION CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
as 3:2024cv08474
Defendant:
SOMERSET PROBATION CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PINCK v. SOMERSET PROBATION
as 3:2024cv06686
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCK
Defendant:
SOMERSET PROBATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PINCKNEY v. SOMERSET PROBATION C.S. ENFORCEMENT
as 3:2024cv05681
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY
Defendant:
SOMERSET PROBATION C.S. ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PINCKNEY v. HONORABLE ROBERT G. WILSON et al
as 3:2024cv05682
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY
Defendant:
HONORABLE ROBERT G. WILSON and SOMERSET SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KENNEDY v. NEW JERSEY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY KENNEDY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PINCKNEY v. SYNDER et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY
Defendant:
STEVEN SYNDER, THOMAS RINALDI and CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
