Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HAFNER v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY and NEW JERSEY SECRETARY OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KNAPP et al v. INDIVIOR, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
MR. GUY KNAPP, MR. WILLIAM KNAPP and MR. PHILLIP L. MILLER
Defendant:
INDIVIOR, INC., AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC., RECKITT BENCKISER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
MARLENE V. PITTMAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
MERRITT GARLAND, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, WILLIAM J. BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIDWAI v. HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2023cv23206
Plaintiff:
YURSIL KIDWAI
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, ESTHER SUAREZ, JANE WEINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHUKWU v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2023cv23010
Plaintiff:
OBIOMA CHUKWU
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY and STATE OF NJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENTZ v. MURPHY 3RD
as 3:2023cv22489
Plaintiff:
TREY LENTZ
Defendant:
ESQ. JOHN MURPHY 3RD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ISAKSEN v. MARINO et al
as 3:2023cv21177
Plaintiff:
ELISA-MARIE ISAKSEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MARINO, PHILLIPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROSSNAGLE'S SERVICE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. LAMONT et al
as 3:2023cv21174
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, JOHN CARNEY, CHARLIE BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
