Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Kallmeyer v. Mathews
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kallmeyer
Defendant:
Samuel Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matlock v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Charles Matlock
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Jerry Collins, Sgt. Samuel Colley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Buttery v. Peace et al
as 6:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Billy Buttery
Defendant:
Samuel Peace and Derick Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buttery v. Peace et al
as 3:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Billy Buttery
Defendant:
Samuel Peace and Derick Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hollon et al v. HCA Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Hollon, Patrick Hollon, Carly Hollon and others
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc., David Muncy, Karen Wooldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Cox et al
as 4:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Sue Carter
Defendant:
Samuel J. Cox, Damon Preston, James Rhorer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. Bendapudi et al
as 3:2021cv00480
Plaintiff:
Austin Roy Clark
Defendant:
Neeli Bendapudi, Lori Gonzales, Toni M. Ganzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Baker et al
as 3:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Quinton D. Smith, Rajon Rondo and Samuel King Baker, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Lynell Willis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yell v. The City of Russellville et al
as 1:2020cv00047
Defendant:
The City of Russellville, Bill Jenkins, Buster Cannon and others
Plaintiff:
Yell and Robert Yell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
