Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Panabaker et al v. Hood River
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Ruston Panabaker, Sheri Panabaker, John J Hutson and others
Defendant:
City of Hood River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kleiber v. Virani
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Kleiber
Defendant:
Farid Virani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kleiber v. Walz et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Kleiber
Defendant:
Governor Tim Walz, Lt. Governor Peggy Flanagan, Attorney General Keith Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lilla v. Federal Gov et al
as 6:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
Shannan Lilla
Defendant:
Federal Gov, Federal Consumer Burough, FCBP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gillum v. City of Pendleton et al
as 2:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
Matthew G. Gillum
Defendant:
City of Pendleton, Pendleton Police Department, Officer Chase T. Addleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
