Cases 1 - 10 of 13
RISENHOOVER v. SHUI-BIAN et al
as 1:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Defendant:
CHEN SHUI-BIAN, STEPHEN YOUNG, CLIFFORD HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARNOLD, et al v. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY et al
as 1:2019cv02755
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DUFOUR, ANDREW CALHOUN, TIMOTHY DEMY and others
Defendant:
NAVY CHIEF OF CHAPLAINS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY and CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00739
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIMES v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2017cv01560
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
MARTINEZ, JIMMIE WILDER, EDWARD STERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILDER v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv00829
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE V. WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILDER v. CHOICE HOTELS et al
as 1:2016cv00801
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE V. WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
CHOICE HOTELS, CAMBRIA SUITES HOTELS AND SUITES, QUALITY INN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILDER v. UNITED STATES MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD et al
as 1:2009cv00615
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE V. WILDER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
