Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Recant v. Day et al
as 1:2024cv04117
Plaintiff:
Robin Recant
Defendant:
Sargent Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nahuatl Nation Elders et al v. Day et al
as 1:2023cv11303
Plaintiff:
Nahuatl Nation Elders, Maria de Jesus Baltierra Maldonado and A.D.M.B.
Defendant:
Matthew Day and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Deide et al v. Day et al
as 7:2023cv03954
Plaintiff:
Sidi Mouhamed Deide, Adama Sy, Abdallahi Salem and others
Defendant:
County Executive Edwin J. Day and County Executive Steven M. Neuhaus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv03729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
