Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Zito v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jordan Zito
Defendant:
Ryan Sullivan, David Clifton, Washoe County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alva v. Lew Lewisburg USP et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James Scott Alva
Defendant:
Lew Lewisburg USP, Ber Berlin FCI, N Cairns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Macleod Colvin v. DeLong et al
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Kary Patrick Macleod Colvin
Defendant:
Robert DeLong and Christopher Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright-Hicks v. Tropical Smoothie Cafe LLC
as 2:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Kiara Wright-Hicks
Defendant:
Tropical Smoothie Cafe LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flaherty v. Balaam et al
as 3:2020cv00666
Defendant:
Darin Balaam, Judge Barry Breslow, David Neidert and others
Plaintiff:
Micah Cameron Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. C.P. Squires Elementary School et al
as 2:2019cv01665
Defendant:
C.P. Squires Elementary School, Joaquin Landeros and Barry Bosacker
Plaintiff:
Michael Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Arpino v. Cherry et al
as 3:2017cv00527
Petitioner:
John Francis Arpino
Respondent:
Judge Janet J Berry, Chief Justice Michael A Cherry, Nathan Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miller v. Steinheimer, et al
as 3:2016cv00317
Defendant:
Richard A. Gammick, Christopher J. Hicks, Travis Look and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Karl Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
