Cases 1 - 10 of 923
Jones et al v. Ontario
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jones and Crystal Jones
Defendant:
City of Ontario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chan et al v. Stefanski et al
as 3:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Chan, Shaynna Myers, Stefan Ascierto and others
Defendant:
John Stefanski, City of San Rafael and Robert Sinnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101 Labor-Management Relations (Findings and Purpose)
(PS) Kepler v. Gingery et al
as 2:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Christian Nicholas Kepler
Defendant:
Virginia L. Gingery, Michael P. Candela, Catherine C. Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Bryson Jones
Defendant:
City of Vallejo and Matthew Komoda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) John-Reif v. Gray et al
as 2:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Daniel John-Reif
Defendant:
Ryan Gray, Sabrina Buis, Todd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
