Cases 1 - 10 of 514
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff, Nation Security Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SANTIAGO v. PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 et al
as 2:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 and BNI AGENT JOHN/JANE DOE 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv02340
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
