Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wright et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv05018
Plaintiff:
Thelma Wright and Jacob Jones
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, OFFICER SZCZUR Star No. 18774, Officer Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00260
Defendant:
Officer Pronek, Officer Maldonado, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Pharrish Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv04521
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Harris
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation, Danilo Loza, Matthew Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mayfield v. P.O. Szczur #18774 et al
as 1:2019cv07363
Defendant:
P.O. Loza #16201, P.O. Ahmed #16497, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Dione Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karageorge v. Urlacher et al
as 1:2018cv03148
Plaintiff:
Tyna Karageorge
Defendant:
Brian Urlacher, Pamela Loza, Abbey Romanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbert v. Loza et al
as 1:2017cv08467
Plaintiff:
Carlen Colbert
Defendant:
Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy C. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love, Jr. v. Supreme Court of Illinois et al
as 1:2017cv05482
Plaintiff:
Lee Oties Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Illinois, Pamela E Loza, Luciano Panici and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mendez et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv02037
Plaintiff:
Laura Mendez and Maria Torres
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, A. H. Zayas and M. A. Loza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loza v. Durkin et al
as 1:2009cv02474
Plaintiff:
Ruben Loza and Ruben Loza
Defendant:
M Durkin, K. McKendry and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manson et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv03024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Manson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, D. Stanek, C. McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
