Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Poulos et al v. City of Monte Vista et al
as 1:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Poulos and Mark Jason Youngers
Defendant:
City of Monte Vista, Joshua Hill, Joshua (I) Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stonefield v. Lopez et al
as 1:2019cv00017
Plaintiff:
Leigh Ann Stonefield
Defendant:
Robert Pino, Evan Lopez, City of Monte Vista, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Montezuma County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2018cv02225
Defendant:
Montezuma Co. Sheriff's Department, Cortez Police Dept., Montezuma County Board of Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Marion O. Harper, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. Pino et al
as 1:2017cv02967
Plaintiff:
Telesforo Joseph Dominguez
Defendant:
Robert Pino, Eduardo Rodriguez, Michael Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatlee et al v. Hardey et al
as 1:2013cv02469
Plaintiff:
Randall J. Hatlee and Ronald L. Swift
Defendant:
Cindy Hardey, Bobbi Priestly, Monte Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coyote et al v. Mont. Co. Shertiff's Dept. et al
as 1:2012cv02368
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Wolfbear Coyote and Marion Ornestus Harper, III
Defendant:
Mont. Co. Shertiff's Dept. , Montezuma Co. Board of Comm. , City of Cortez, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
