Cases 1 - 10 of 13
NARCUSSE v. GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE et al
as 5:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Marie Narcisse and MARIE M MARCISSE
Defendant:
GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE, Peter Wrobel, Shad Stormant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade et al v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Betty Wade and David Jacob Henegar
Defendant:
Keambriah Morgan, Jessica Blount, Tamara Grier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Manuel v. The United States et al
as 1:2022cv04152
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Manuel
Defendant:
The United States and All Magistrate Judges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rowland v. City of Lilburn Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv04601
Defendant:
Georgia Bureau of Investigation, City of Lawrenceville Police Department, City of Lilburn Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Darwyn Grant Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland et al v. Polk County et al
as 4:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Edward Rowland, Jr. , Edward Rowland, Sr. , Becky Crawford and others
Defendant:
Polk County , Josh Smith , Jane Does (1-3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Rowland
as 4:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Robbins
Defendant:
Kelly Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Owens et al
as 4:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
Shawn Singleton
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Timothy C. Ward, Clay Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUE vs. CAMP, et al.
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F A GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
