Cases 1 - 10 of 252
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Hopkins v. Town of Savanna et al
as 6:2024cv00269
Defendant:
Jeffery Scott Smith, Jr and Town of Savanna
Plaintiff:
Katie Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Normali v. Seminole County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Shawna Normali
Defendant:
Amanda Windle, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, Anthony Louie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terhorst et al v. Shropshire et al
as 5:2024cv00697
Defendant:
Daniel O Thomas, Susan Allen, Stephen Hankins and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A Terhorst and Robert T Terhorst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Dodd et al
as 6:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Falesha Babe Roberts
Defendant:
Gary W. Dodd, Christian Smith, Amanda Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatcher v. Yang et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hatcher
Defendant:
Sylvain Yang and Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Olupitan v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Martina O Olupitan
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Michael J Smith, Gary Raskob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lietzke v. Birmingham City of et al
as 5:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Birmingham City of and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
