Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Tepe v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, United States, Rebecca Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
English v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
James-Thomas English
Defendant:
The United States Of America, Montgomery County Courthouse, State Of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reynolds v. Stewart et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Loren-Michael Reynolds
Defendant:
James E. Stewart, Sr., Judge Emanuel, Senae Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Montez v. Stewart Family Hospitals or Family
as 5:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
Stewart Family Hospitals or Family
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
