Cases 1 - 10 of 818
Williams v. Tetens et al
as 6:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
LaCrisha Williams
Defendant:
Josh Tetens, Thomas West, Mark Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasek v. Barnett et al
as 6:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
James L. Vasek
Defendant:
Dolores June Barnett, Jeffrey Sharp, Thomas Phillip Eitel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Susan D Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Boone v. Matthews
as 4:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Boone
Defendant:
Kelly Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
