Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Parents Defending Education v. Croton-Harmon Union Free School District et al
as 7:2024cv04485
Plaintiff:
Parents Defending Education
Defendant:
Croton-Harmon Union Free School District, Croton-Harmon Board of Education, Stephen Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
McCarthy v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2024cv03286
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy
Defendant:
David Kaplan, Gabriel Clague, Samantha Clague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCarthy v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2023cv11324
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy
Defendant:
David Kaplan, Gabriel Clague, Samantha Clague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCarthy v. Qatar Airways, Q.C.S.C.
as 1:2023cv11200
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy
Defendant:
Qatar Airways, Q.C.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv10398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
L.B. v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08501
Plaintiff:
L.B., and L.B.
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jess Dannhauser, Ariel Semper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flannery v. County of Niagara et al
as 1:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Jennifer G Flannery
Defendant:
County of Niagara, Sheriff Michael J. Filicetti, PrimeCare Medical of New York, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
