Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Balderama v. Bulman, et al
as 23-2063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVIER BALDERAMA
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANNON BULMAN, in her official capacity as Judge for the First District Court of New Mexico, MARY MARLOWE SOMMER, in her official capacity as Chief Judge for the First District Court of New Mexico, KRISTINA BOGARDUS, in her official capacity as Judge of the New Mexico Court of Appeals and others
Office of the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00730
Plaintiff:
Enlace Comunitario, New Mexico Faith Coalition for Immigrant Justice, Office of the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Dickman v. Sedillo et al
as 1:2018cv00371
Plaintiff:
Frank K. Dickman, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Sedillo, Four Hills Studio Apartments, State of New Mexico, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Billy Punchard v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 17-16567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY PUNCHARD
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, LUNA COUNTY NEW MEXICO BOARD OF COMMISSIONS, SUSANA MARTINEZ, Governor of State of New Mexico and others
Mohammad v. Banks, et al
as 16-2074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALID MOHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEN BANKS, Chief, Albuquerque Police Department, RAMON RUSTIN, Chief, Metropolitan Detention Center, GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico and others
Southwest Counseling Center, Inc. v. Human Services Department of the State of NM, et al
as 2:2014cv01070
Plaintiff:
Southwest Counseling Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Human Services Department of the State of New Mexico and Office of the Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
