Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AHMED v. GABLE et al
as 1:2021cv03333
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD MOKHTAR AHMED
Defendant:
CHARLES H. GABLE, IV, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, DAVID M. BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES-BEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02785
Plaintiff:
AMAALA JONES-BEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TERRENCE SUTTON, CARLOS TEJERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOHARAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2021cv02607
Plaintiff:
FAHMI AHMED MOHARAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TERRORIST SCREENING CENTER, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELSHAZLI v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv01831
Defendant:
JOHN JAVELLE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MATTHEW KONKOL
Plaintiff:
AHMED ELSHAZLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUTHANA v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2019cv00445
Undetermined:
Secretary of State MICHAEL R. POMPEO, Attorney General WILLIAM P. BARR and President of US DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
AHMED ALI MUTHANA
Defendant:
MICHAEL POMPEO, WILLIAM PELHAM BARR and DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LOVELIEN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01869
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Nadia Ahmed, Daniel Schiess and others
Plaintiff:
Rick Lovelien and Steven Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
