Cases 1 - 10 of 64
STEVENS v. THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
CALVIN T. STEVENS
Defendant:
THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, MAURICE FINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
DEJESUS v. COTTON et al
as 2:2022cv06107
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
RICHARD COTTON, JOAQIN D. LIGUAS and ALLIANCE ONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EZEKWO v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 1:2022cv01287
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PATERSON SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FINNEMEN v. DONIO et al
as 3:2021cv19485
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANN MARIE DONIO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE NOEL L. HILLMAN, TERRENCE MERRIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS v. DIVISION NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS et al
as 2:2021cv18413
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
DIVISION NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS, ELIZABETH M RUSSIAW, WALESKA LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REIMER v. UNITED STATES SENATE et al
as 2:2021cv10997
Defendant:
BEN SASSE, SUSAN COLLINS, MIKE ROUNDS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J REIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
