Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Burton et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2023cv05836
Plaintiff:
Cedric Burton, Jasman Maxwell and Amber Griffin
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Victor Walker, Raymond Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hill v. Bernat et al
as 1:2023cv03618
Plaintiff:
Danielle Hill
Defendant:
Jennifer Bernat, David Portnoy, David Apelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Warren v. CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
Quennel D. Warren
Defendant:
CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC, CorrectHealth, LLC, Millenia Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
