Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Amos v. Simmons et al
as 2:2021at00229
Defendant:
Zachary Simmons and County of San Joaquin
Plaintiff:
Courtney Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. Simmons et al
as 2:2021cv00470
Defendant:
Zachary Simmons and County of San Joaquin
Plaintiff:
Courtney Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shomari Alberts v. NALS Apartment Homes et al
as 2:2020cv09320
Plaintiff:
Shomari Amos Alberts
Defendant:
NALS Vista Apartment Homes and NALS Apartment Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivas Sports, Inc. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv08312
Defendant:
Dr. Barbara Ferrer, Alex Villanueva, Dr. Muntu Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Simon Management Associates II, LLC, Del Amo Fashion Center Operating Company, L.L.C., Daisy Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Daniels et al v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2020cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ariele Rost Amo, Susan Adell Daniels, Cannon Hugh Daniels and others
Defendant:
Oroville Hospital, Butte County Sheriff's Department, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
