Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Li et al v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2023cv15485
Plaintiff:
Dongping Li, Xiaozhen Mai, Patrick McGuire and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Commissioner Matthew Beaudet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nelson v. Bowers et al
as 1:2023cv09884
Plaintiff:
Darrion Nelson
Defendant:
Village of Park Forest Police Officers R. Bowers, Officer R. Purdy, Officer G. Goycochea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prokop et al v. Hileman et al
as 1:2021cv00450
Defendant:
John Borgens, City of Hometown, FNU Kosmowski and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Coglianese and Victoria Prokop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li v. Hughes et al
as 1:2017cv02498
Plaintiff:
Linda Li
Defendant:
Elizabeth Hughes, Laura Forester, Vladimir Lozovskiy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Stovall -El. v. Department Of Human Serivices(DHS) et al
as 3:2013cv50200
Plaintiff:
Kurt Douglas Stovall -El.
Defendant:
Department Of Human Serivices(DHS), Division Of Rehabilitation Services(DRS), Amy Donalson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
