Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Neely v. Atlanta Public Schools et al
as 1:2014cv01604
Plaintiff:
Camille Neely
Defendant:
Atlanta Public Schools, Erroll B. Davis and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Farmer et al v. Board of Regents of the University et al
as 1:2010cv02148
Plaintiff:
Jacob Farmer , Andrew Cannon , Rico Arellano and others
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, Erroll B. Davis, Earl B. Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Georgia State Conference of NAACP Branches et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2010cv00041
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of NAACP Branches , Jaysmyne Hendricks and Joshua Harmon
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Sonny Perdue, Erroll B. Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1683 Prohibition against sex discrimination in education
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
