Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Morrill v. Aarhaus et al
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
David Morrill
Defendant:
Alyssa Aarhaus, Bren Rogers, Charles Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Colorado Division of Securities, The, et al.
as 1:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
CDS, Colorado Division of Securities, The, United States Securities Exchange Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 - Americans With Disabilities Act - Employment
Kennedy v. Paul et al
as 1:2021cv00772
Plaintiff:
Alan Kennedy
Defendant:
Douglas Paul, Daniel Hokanson, Richard Sandrock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beatty v. Rossmeissl
as 1:2020cv01504
Defendant:
Ian Robert Rossmeissl
Plaintiff:
Marissa M. Beatty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowlin v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Arapahoe, Colorado et al
as 1:2017cv02374
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Arapahoe, Colorado , David Walcher , Louie Perea and others
Plaintiff:
Nicol Nowlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson et al. v. City of Denver et al.
as 1:2016cv01268
Plaintiff:
Theodore R. Ferguson, Avery Beatty, David S. Agnew and others
Defendant:
City of Denver, Denver Police Department, Kevin Edling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00443
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
