Cases 1 - 10 of 19
PRUDHOMME v. MICHLES et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
ADAM J PRUDHOMME
Defendant:
MARCUS MICHLES, RAINEY BOOTH, ADRIAN BRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dang v. Matthias et al
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Mailin Thi Dang
Defendant:
Cheyanna Matthias, Kaitlin Booth, Michelle Bregoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dang v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 6:2023cv02344
Plaintiff:
Mailin Thi Dang, Jaiden Van Andersen, Chance Caleb Dang and others
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Casselberry Police Department, Seminole Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Webb v. Miami-Dade County Government et al
as 1:2023cv23122
Plaintiff:
David Q. Webb
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County Government, Mayor of Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade County Homeless Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bento v. Booth et al
as 6:2021cv02078
Plaintiff:
George Bento
Defendant:
Bryan Booth and Charles Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denson v. Collier County et al
as 2:2021cv00497
Plaintiff:
Anthony Denson, Jr.
Defendant:
Collier County, Kevin Rambosk, Matthew Kinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01509
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Beasley v. City of Daytona Beach et al
as 6:2021cv00850
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC BEASLEY
Defendant:
MARCUS BOOTH, JAMES MAHER and City of Daytona Beach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
