Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KARAM et al v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2016cv02472
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KARAM and AMANDA BOWERS
Defendant:
NICHOLAS BOWEN, KIRK COOKSEY, ALLEN CUMMINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COWE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY OCEAN COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES et al
as 3:2015cv05876
Plaintiff:
NEAL A. COWE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY OCEAN COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, TOMS RIVER POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT, TOMS RIVER ANIMAL HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. PALMER et al
as 3:2014cv06896
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. MURPHY
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. PALMER, JR., RYAN REIFF, EMMETT SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BITON et al v. UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
as 2:2011cv05106
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BITON, CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON and DANIELLE BITON
Defendant:
UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, DWECK, ADRIANNE MAIDENBAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELLEADY et al v. BLAKE et al
as 1:2011cv01807
Plaintiff:
JOHN MELLEADY and VIRGINIA KEEFER
Defendant:
ALLISON BLAKE, KATHI WAY, DEBORAH WATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
VANDEGRIFT v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2007cv02623
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. VANDEGRIFT
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. BOWEN, THE CITY OF MARGATE and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWENS v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2007cv00637
Plaintiff:
CLARK BOWENS
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON, TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, RYAN WOODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
