Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Nelson v. Murdie et al
as 1:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Adam Murdie, Josh Ashe, Midge Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NELSON v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Defendant:
BEN RUSSELL, DAVID WAITE, KENNETH MURRAY PLOTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
v. NELSON et al
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
BRETT-ANDREW NELSON
Defendant:
DONALD CORWIN JACKSON, LORI BETH TALBOT, ASHKEY MORGAN BURGEMEISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Russell et al
as 1:2022cv00195
Petitioner:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Respondent:
Ben Russell, David Waite, Kenneth Murray Plotz and others
Nelson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Donald Corwin Jackson, Lori Beth Talbot, Ashley Morgan Burgemeister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Russell et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Ben Russell, David Waite, Kenneth Murray Plotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NELSON v. PLOTZ et al
as 1:2021cv01409
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, SETH RYAN, DAVID WAITE and others
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nelson v. Gallagher et al
as 1:2020cv03525
Defendant:
Lewis T. Babcock and Gordon Gallagher
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Hindes et al
as 1:2020cv03457
Defendant:
Sarah Hindes, Wesley Hersberger and Michael Meeuwsen
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Coleman et al
as 1:2020cv03453
Defendant:
Sarah Coleman, Donald Corwin Jackson and Jennifer L. Pacheco
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
