Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Powers v. The Town Of East Hampton et al
as 2:2024cv02263
Plaintiff:
Peter Powers
Defendant:
The Town Of East Hampton, Kathee Burke-Gonzalez, David Lys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doyle v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2023cv08871
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, James Burke, Thomas Spota and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Olmo v. Matosleo et al
as 1:2023cv10510
Plaintiff:
Raquel Olmo
Defendant:
Mariela N. Matosleo, Captain Noreen E. Lazarus, Edward Lam and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Newkirk v. Douglas Elliman, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07040
Plaintiff:
Shaniqua Newkirk
Defendant:
Douglas Elliman, Inc., Douglas Elliman Realty, LLC, Douglas Elliman Of L.I. LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Fetzner v. Town of Gates et al
as 6:2023cv06229
Plaintiff:
Scott Fetzner
Defendant:
Town of Gates, Martijn Verbakel, Guy Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
