Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Thomas et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Walter Thomas and Desmond Bailey
Defendant:
Victor Hill and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Middlebrooks v. Kasmar et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lillie M. Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Sergeant Scott Kasmar, Major Chris DeHart, Private First Class Chris Ridling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bailey v. Lockheed Martin Aerospace Company et al
as 4:2023cv00289
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Aerospace Company, Justin Tyme, Justin Tyme Hostutler and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Michele Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ATTORNEY BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
