Cases 1 - 10 of 342
SA et al v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2024cv06631
Plaintiff:
CARLOS SA and CHRISTINE SA
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2017-A, MORTGAGE-BACKED NOTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCANTS v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
as 2:2024cv05837
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCCANTS
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO doing business as JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WAITERS et al v. REPUBLIC BANK et al
as 1:2024cv05728
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA R. WAITERS, CYLE A. BURNETT and VICKIE BURNETT-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
REPUBLIC BANK and CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLANEY et al v. YOUSSEF et al
as 2:2024cv05120
Plaintiff:
MARY BLANEY and MAROSE REALTY CORP
Defendant:
DOHA YOUSSEF, VALLEY BANK, ANTHONY BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DODSON v. TD BANK HEADQUARTERS et al
as 2:2024cv04431
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
TD BANK HEADQUARTERS, SMART CELL, DRIVEWORKS AUTO CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DILLARD v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al
as 2:2024cv04146
Plaintiff:
DERECK DILLARD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK and CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SHAH v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
as 3:2023cv23421
Plaintiff:
PETER SHAH
Defendant:
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
DODSON v. BANK OF AMERICA'S HEADQUARTERS
as 2:2023cv23398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA'S HEADQUARTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
