Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BATISTA v. SURGICORE OF JERSEY CITY, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv21717
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BATISTA
Defendant:
SURGICORE OF JERSEY CITY, LLC and MARINA AMINOVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CERIGO et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 2:2023cv04311
Plaintiff:
THEO CERIGO and NANCY SMITH
Defendant:
CASSEY MCKENNA, GABRIEL MOREANO, EUGENE LUGTU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GALLOWAY v. CITY OF WEST ORANGE et al
as 2:2023cv03740
Plaintiff:
Ian Galloway
Defendant:
CITY OF WEST ORANGE, WEST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, The Office of the City Clerk, West Orange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS, SR. v. ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 2:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
HAROLD ANTHONY ROSS, SR.
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, HONORABLE DAVID KATZ, J.S.C, HONORABLE ARTHUR BATISTA, J.S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BATISTA v. STEVENSON et al
as 1:2021cv18252
Plaintiff:
JON BATISTA
Defendant:
GARY STEVENSON, SUSAN JACOBUCCI and GEORJEAN WIDENER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARROLL-O'NEAL v. DEMPSEY et al
as 2:2021cv00878
Defendant:
TONY GUTIERREZ, SYBIL ELIAS, ARTHUR J BATISTA and others
Plaintiff:
RHAMIL CARROLL-O'NEAL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
BATISTA et al v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD et al
as 2:2020cv15618
Defendant:
DANIEL BERGER, THOMAS J. GALLAGHER, BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
ARELIS BATISTA and CARLOS MORA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATISTA et al v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv14741
Defendant:
DANIEL BERGER, THOMAS J. GALLAGHER, BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
ARELIS BATISTA and CARLOS MORA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CABBELL V. JUDGE BATISTA
as 2:2015cv08499
Plaintiff:
APRIL RENEA CABBELL
Defendant:
JUDGE BATISTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CABBELL v. JUDGE BATISTA
as 2:2015cv08376
Plaintiff:
APRIL-RENEA CABBELL
Defendant:
JUDGE BATISTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
