Cases 1 - 10 of 26
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535 et al v. RUBIO et al
as 3:2024cv04655
Plaintiff:
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, RONALD SATISH EMRIT and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897 doing business as UNITED EMRITS OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SENATOR MARCO RUBIO, SENATOR RICK SCOTT, SENATOR CHRIS COONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
BUSSINELLI et al v. TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH et al
as 2:2023cv21519
Plaintiff:
GUIDO BUSSINELLI, SCOTT CHERVEN and KEVIN D. HEBERT
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH, JAMES WYSOCKI, WARD DONIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REIMER v. UNITED STATES SENATE et al
as 2:2021cv10997
Defendant:
BEN SASSE, SUSAN COLLINS, MIKE ROUNDS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J REIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MCMILLAN v. PAZIENZA-MCMILLAN
as 3:2019cv08301
Plaintiff:
BEN H. MCMILLAN, JR.
Defendant:
LOUISA E. PAZIENZA-MCMILLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv15651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FOGG v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2017cv02326
Plaintiff:
NORMAN BEN FOGG
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, HARRY EARLE, JOHN DOES 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
